AI Voice Agent for Healthcare: Guide to Build a HIPAA Ready Voice Agent with Dograh

AI voice agents are quickly becoming the "new front desk" for clinics and hospitals. They answer calls, book visits, collect patient details, and escalate urgent cases to doctors . If your phones are busy, your hold times are high, and staff are burned out, this guide is for you.

Best AI Voice Agents for Healthcare + How to Build One (Dograh)

AI voice agents help healthcare teams handle real phone calls/patient queries at scale. This post shows how to evaluate options, then build a HIPAA-ready agent using Dograh AI.

Who this guide is for (clinics, hospitals, payers)

If you run operations, IT, patient access, or a digital team, you already know the problem. Phones never stop, staffing is hard, and patients hate waiting.

This guide is for:

• Clinics that need appointment booking, reminders, and FAQ coverage
• Hospitals and health systems that need governance, audit logs, integrations, and escalation rules
• Payers that need member outreach, benefits answers, and prior auth-style call flows

From my own work, voice agents are starting to look like chatbots did five years ago: early, imperfect, but already useful for 24/7 coverage and repetitive tasks. I am generally bullish on voice for access and intake, but only when it is built with strict guardrails and a clear escalation path.

Quick definition: what an AI voice agent in healthcare does

An AI voice agent in healthcare is a phone-based AI assistant that talks and listens like a human. It can answer questions, capture patient details, and take actions like booking an appointment.

It is different from:

• A chatbot: chat is text-first; voice agents run on real calls
• An IVR: IVR is "press 1, press 2"; voice agents handle natural speech and intent

What this post covers (roundup + checklist + build steps)

You will get:

• A clear "what it is" and how it works
• Healthcare use cases across the patient journey
• A selection checklist for HIPAA and safety
• A tool roundup with compliance notes
• Open source options and self-host guidance
• A step-by-step build using Dograh AI
• Testing, monitoring, and rollout plan

Myths (that slow teams down)

Most teams delay because of assumptions that are not fully true. Here are three common myths worth clearing up early.

1. Myth: Voice agents are always non-compliant
Reality: Compliance depends on architecture, vendor contracts, access controls, and retention rules. Open source and self-hosting can reduce risky data hops.

2. Myth: AI will replace nurses and doctors
Reality: The best deployments reduce admin load and improve routing. Urgent and clinical decisions still require human escalation (Doctor & Nurses) and policy guardrails.

3. Myth: Platform sends PHI to third-party clouds
Reality: With open source voice ai user can self-host major parts of the stack, and can minimize PHI (Protected Health Information) exposure with redaction and minimum-necessary design. Users still need BAAs (Backend-as-a-service) for vendors that touch PHI.

What an AI Voice Agent for Healthcare Is (and How It Works)

A healthcare voice agent is a system, not a single model. It is a pipeline that moves speech into actions, with safety and compliance controls around it.

How it works in simple steps (call > STT > LLM > tools > TTS)

Think of it as a loop:

1. Telephony receives the call The system answers an inbound number or places an outbound call.
2. STT (speech-to-text) Patient speech becomes text for processing.
3. LLM reasoning and policy The AI decides what to do next using rules, intent detection, and workflow logic.
4. Tool calls (EHR/CRM/scheduler/billing) The agent calls APIs or webhooks to fetch or update real systems.
5. TTS (text-to-speech) The agent speaks back to the patient in a natural voice.
6. Logging and analytics You store transcripts, metadata, and outcomes based on retention rules.

Where AI fits in hospitals and clinics (front desk to back office)

Most value shows up in workflows that are frequent and predictable. That usually starts at the front door.

Common fit areas:

• Front desk: new patient calls, hours, directions, insurance accepted
• Scheduling: book, reschedule, cancel, waitlist
• Patient intake: capture reason-for-visit and symptom details
• Billing: balance questions, payment links, claim status routing
• Follow-ups: lab reminders, post-discharge check-ins
• Internal ops: routing calls to teams, creating tickets, updating CRM fields

Benefits that show up fast (24/7, faster answers, less staff load)

You usually see benefits quickly when calls are high-volume. Healthcare call centers often miss targets.

Example benchmarks from healthcare call center data:

• Average hold time (ASA): 4.4 minutes actual vs <50 seconds target (HFMA target)
• Abandonment rate: 7% average vs <5% target (CMS/VHA)
• Daily call volume: ~2,000 calls, and monthly inbound volume: 55-60k calls

Practical benefits:

• 24/7 answering without adding shifts
• Fewer abandoned calls and missed bookings
• Deflection of repetitive questions
• Less staff burnout from repetitive scripts
• Consistent capture of intake details and consent steps

Use Cases and ROI by Patient Journey (Real Pilot Lessons)

The best healthcare voice projects start with one workflow. Then they expand once quality and safety are proven.

Inbound: AI receptionist (scheduling, FAQs, routing)

An AI receptionist is often the fastest win. It handles the front desk phone without long holds.

Common tasks:

• Book, reschedule, cancel appointments
• Answer FAQs (hours, location, prep instructions)
• Route to the right team (billing, referrals, nurse line)
• Collect basic details before handoff

Why it matters: the phone problem is measurable. If your hold time is minutes, you lose patients and staff time.

The call center benchmarks show a gap: 4.4 minutes average hold time vs <50 seconds target and 7% abandonment vs <5% target. Voice agents do not fix staffing, but they can absorb repetitive calls that create the queue.

Pre-visit intake: symptom capture and reason-for-visit (best ROI)

Pre-visit intake is one of the highest ROI use cases I have seen. It can replace forms, reduce nurse time, and improve schedule readiness.

What it does:

• Confirms identity and contact details
• Captures reason for visit in structured fields
• Collects symptoms, duration, basic history prompts
• Flags urgent intent for immediate escalation
• Writes a clean summary into your system (or sends to staff)

From real pilots and deployments, hospitals often see 5x-10x ROI on pre-visit intake depending on volume. The savings come from staff time and fewer incomplete visits.

Do not let the agent diagnose. Use it to capture and route safely.

There is also growing evidence that well-evaluated generative voice systems can be safe at scale. A large safety evaluation with over 307,000 simulated patient interactions, each reviewed by licensed clinicians, reported medical advice accuracy exceeding 99%, with no instances of potentially severe harm in that evaluation.

That does not remove your responsibility. It does support the case for careful design, testing, and escalation policies.

Outbound: reminders, meds, lab follow-ups, no-show reduction

Outbound calling is straightforward to automate and easy to measure. It can improve equity when done in the patient's preferred language.

Common outbound flows:

• Appointment reminders and confirmations
• Medication reminders (non-emergency adherence support)
• Lab follow-up nudges ("your lab is ready, please check portal / call back")
• Post-discharge check-ins (symptom screen -> escalate if urgent)
• Preventive care outreach

One practical example from field experience: an AI agent conducted personalized, language-concordant outreach and saw more than double the FIT test opt-in rate among Spanish-speaking patients (18.2% vs 7.1%), with longer call durations (6.05 vs 4.03 minutes). That suggests voice agents can reduce disparities when designed and monitored well.

Emerging: wearables voice (patient talks to vitals + trends)

Wearables plus voice is an emerging pattern. Patients ask "what changed" instead of reading charts.

A safe version of this:

• "What was my resting heart rate trend this week?"
• "Did my sleep improve compared to last week?"
• "What should I do next?" (non-emergency guidance + disclaimers)

Guardrail: for urgent symptoms, the agent should escalate. It should not replace clinical triage.

Research on voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants (VIPAs) also predicts broad use in remote anamnesis and patient interactions, while noting patients still prefer humans for psychological support.

Selection Checklist: What to Look for in a Healthcare Voice Assistant

Choosing a vendor is mostly about risk control. Features matter but safety, governance, and integrations decide success.

Compliance basics: HIPAA, BAA, SOC 2 (and what they really mean)

HIPAA discussions get confusing fast. Here is a direct evaluation approach.

Check:

• HIPAA alignment: Does the vendor commit to HIPAA support in writing, with clear boundaries?
• BAA (Business Associate Agreement): Will they sign it, and for which components?
• SOC 2 / ISO 27001: Not a HIPAA requirement, but a useful signal for security controls and auditability

Clinics vs health systems:

• Small clinics often need speed and a reasonable BAA scope.
• Health systems usually need deeper governance: audit logs, access reviews, retention controls, and sometimes on-prem deployment.

PHI handling and safety: redaction, audit logs, retention, access control

Assume PHI will appear in calls. Design as if every transcript could be audited.

Checklist:

• Role-based access control (RBAC) for transcripts and recordings
• Encryption in transit and at rest
• Configurable retention windows (audio and text separately)
• Consent capture language (recording and data use)
• Redaction/masking for sensitive fields (DOB, SSN, member IDs)
• Audit logs for: logins, exports, prompt edits, workflow edits
• Least-privilege access to EHR and scheduling APIs
• Separate environments for dev/test/prod

Human handoff for urgent cases (must-have safety rule)

Every healthcare voice agent needs an escalation design. This is non-negotiable.

A safe handoff pattern:

1. Detect emergency or urgent intent (chest pain, stroke signs, suicidal ideation, severe shortness of breath)
2. Use a policy-based response: If emergency intent is detected: instruct to call local emergency services (or transfer to nurse line if policy allows)
3. Perform a warm transfer with transcript summary: Transfer the call to staff. Provide a short structured summary: reason, symptoms, duration, risk flags, patient identifiers captured

Integrations that matter (EHR/CRM, scheduling, prior auth, payments)

Most projects fail because they are voice-only. Real ROI needs actions.

Look for:

• Webhooks and API support for custom actions
• Scheduling integrations (clinic calendar, practice management systems)
• CRM/ticketing to create tasks for staff
• Eligibility/benefits tools if you run payer-style workflows
• Payment links for billing calls (careful with PCI scope)
• Ability to run in your network or meet data residency needs

A helpful real-world reference is the ongoing community discussion on integration needs and analytics expectations, like "AI handled 47 calls today, booked 23 appointments."

Future of Work: 4x4x4x4 Model for Human-AI Collaboration | Prabakaran Murugaiah posted on the topic | LinkedIn

My future of work framing: the 4 x 4 x 4 x 4 idea When I look at where this is going, I use a simple mental model: 4 days a week 4 hours a day 4 shifts a day $4 an hour (Expected ai assistant cost) The future looks like this: Human workforce at $40/hour, supported by an AI assistant that costs about $4/hour. This is not a promise and not a pricing sheet. It’s a direction. The core idea is that AI co-workers will work faster, cover more hours (cover multiple shifts), and lower the cost of routine operations. As a result, businesses will redesign their workflows around this new reality. I recently had an insightful conversation with Pritesh Kumar on the future of AI transformation at work and across the workforce. Below are the top 10 insights. The full blog link is in the comments. Top 10 Insights on the Future of Work & Workforce 1. Work is shifting from roles to outcomes. 2. Copilots are transitional; autonomous AI workers are the end state. 3. AI replaces tasks, not entire roles. 4. Managers will become orchestrators of humans and AI. 5. Productivity will be measured by decision velocity. 6. Skills adjacency will matter more than deep specialization. 7. 24x7 digital labor + Human Assistance will redefine availability. 8. Organizations will flatten as coordination work disappears. 9. Competitive advantage will come from AI adoption speed. 10. AI will become a formal workforce category. Maayu AI and Maayu Government Solutions are deploying #DigitalHumans as autonomous #AIworkers that deliver outcomes, not just assistance. These #AIcoworkers operate 24×7, can read, write, speak, listen, and see simultaneously, and provide personalized, one-to-one support at scale across recruiting and workforce programs. Led by Michael T. , Maayu Government Solutions deploys AI Digital Human Coaches to support veterans, transitioning service members, and unemployed workers with personalized, one-to-one guidance at scale, available 24×7, without requiring a computer or smartphone.

LinkedInPrabakaran Murugaiah

Open Source Options for Healthcare (Self-Host, Data Residency, GitHub)

Open source helps when you need control. But open source does not mean compliant by default.

Why open source helps compliance (less data leaves your servers)

Healthcare compliance is mostly about limiting exposure and proving control. Self-hosting can reduce the number of external systems that touch PHI.

From my experience, this is the biggest practical reason open source wins in healthcare:

• Fewer third-party hops
• Lower multi-tenant risk
• Better support for data residency
• Often lower latency when co-located with your systems

This matches common guidance: open source can run on-prem or in your own servers, reducing leakage risk and supporting residency requirements.

If you want a starting point repo to study common patterns, this is a useful reference: Healthcare AI Voice Agent (GitHub workflow example). Use it for architecture ideas, not as a finished compliant product.

What "HIPAA-ready" means for open source (you still need policies)

HIPAA-ready means you can build a compliant system with the right controls. It does not mean the software alone makes you compliant.

Shared responsibility checklist:

• Secure hosting (networking, patching, secrets management)
• RBAC and access reviews
• Audit logging and export controls
• Data retention rules for audio and transcripts
• Incident response plan and breach workflows
• BAAs for any vendors that touch PHI (telephony, STT, TTS, hosting, logging)

Where to find AI voice agents open source (GitHub search tips)

Search smart so you do not end up with a demo project. A good repo is active, documented, and deployable.

Practical search and evaluation steps:

• Search keywords: "voice agent", "telephony", "SIP", "Twilio", "STT TTS", "LLM agent"
• Check license first (MIT/Apache/GPL) and confirm commercial use
• Review commit activity (last 30-90 days)
• Look for environment variable patterns (secrets not committed)
• Confirm BYO STT/LLM/TTS support
• Look for logging and observability hooks
• Read deployment docs (Docker/Kubernetes)
• Check whether it supports on-prem storage and retention control

Step-by-Step: Build a HIPAA-Ready AI Voice Agent with Dograh AI

This is the practical build section. We will focus on a safe, high-ROI workflow and a HIPAA-ready architecture pattern.

Architecture blueprint (telephony + STT/LLM/TTS + tools + storage)

A simple reference architecture looks like this:

• Telephony provider (inbound/outbound calling)
• STT provider (speech-to-text)
• LLM provider (reasoning + workflow)
• TTS provider (voice output)
• Dograh AI workflow layer (orchestrates the conversation)
• Tools layer (webhooks/APIs to scheduler/EHR/CRM)
• Storage (transcripts, call metadata) with retention rules
• Analytics and monitoring

Dograh AI is built for the orchestration layer:

• Drag-and-drop workflow builder
• Build flows in plain English
• Multi-agent workflow paths (decision-tree style to reduce hallucinations)
• BYO STT/LLM/TTS keys
• Webhooks to call your APIs
• Variable extraction from calls for follow-up actions
• Self-hostable, open source, with a managed cloud option

You can start on the hosted builder here: Dograh AI cloud app. You can also learn more about the platform here: Dograh AI.

HIPAA-ready design choice: self-host Dograh and co-locate storage. This is the direction I recommend when PHI risk is high or residency rules are strict.

Step 1: Define the workflow (receptionist or pre-visit intake)

Pick one workflow that is high-volume and predictable. For many teams, that is receptionist or intake.

Example: Pre-visit intake (recommended for ROI)

Define:

• Entry conditions: "new patient", "existing patient", "post-discharge", etc.
• Required fields:
  

  1. Full name

  2. DOB (or alternate verification)

  3. Callback number

  4. Reason for visit (structured categories + free-text)

  5. Symptoms + duration (structured prompts)

  6. Consent to proceed and recording notice (per policy)

• Stop conditions:
  

  1. Emergency intent triggers escalation

  2. Patient requests a human

  3. Verification fails after 2 tries

Short script outline:

• Greeting + disclosure
• Identity verification
• Reason for visit
• Symptom capture (non-diagnostic)
• Confirm summary
• Next step: schedule or route to staff

Guardrails to add early:

• The agent does not provide diagnosis
• The agent avoids collecting extra PHI beyond minimum necessary
• Clear emergency language and escalation path

Step 2: Build in Dograh (drag-drop + plain English + multi-agent paths)

Build the workflow as decision nodes instead of one long prompt. This reduces hallucinations and keeps behavior predictable.

In Dograh, a practical build pattern:

• Node 1: Greeting + consent
• Node 2: Verification (name + DOB) If mismatch > retry > then route to staff
• Node 3: Intent detection schedule / intake / billing / urgent / other
• Node 4: Intake collection Ask structured questions, store variables
• Node 5: Tool call via webhook Create an intake ticket, or write to your system
• Node 6: Confirmation + next step
• Node 7: Handoff Warm transfer with transcript summary

Dograh strengths that matter in healthcare:

• You can build in plain English, but still keep strict branching
• Multi-agent workflow paths act like a decision tree
• You can extract variables like:
  

  patient_name, dob, reason_for_visit, symptoms, duration, risk_flag

• Webhooks let you:
  

  1. Create a task in your ticketing system

  2. Push structured intake into your CRM

  3. Call a scheduling API

Step 3: Add knowledge + context (RAG for patient history when allowed)

Use context only when it is permitted and necessary. This is where teams often over-collect.

A safe approach:

• Store a small call history summary per patient ID
• Keep PHI minimal
• Use strict access control so only the right workflows can retrieve it
• Log every retrieval in audit logs

This matches a practical rule: retrieval should help with continuity, not turn the agent into a chart reader.

Vapi vs Open Source Voice Agents: Which to Choose?

Discover Vapi vs Open-Source voice agents like Dograh, Pipecat, LiveKit, and Vocode to decide the best option for cost, control, and scale.

Vapi vs Open Source

What is RAG for patient history (minimum-necessary context retrieval)?

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) is a pattern where the agent retrieves small pieces of approved information from a knowledge store. Then it uses that information to respond, instead of guessing.

For healthcare, the key is minimum necessary retrieval. Do not load the full chart. Pull only what the workflow needs, like prior appointment instructions or a last call summary.

A practical RAG setup for patient history:

• A controlled data store (your database or approved document store)
• A retrieval layer that checks identity and permissions
• A short context window passed to the agent
• Audit logs that record which data was retrieved, when, and why

This directly addresses a common failure mode: losing patient context. It also reduces PHI exposure by limiting what is retrieved.

Security, Privacy, and Safety Controls (Healthcare Must-Haves)

Security is the product in healthcare. Your voice agent is only as safe as its PHI flow and operational controls.

PHI flow map (where PHI can appear and how to limit it)

Start by mapping PHI exposure points. This makes the rest of the compliance decisions clear.

PHI can appear in:

• Audio recordings (raw voice)
• Transcripts (text)
• Tool calls (EHR writes, scheduling requests)
• Logs (debug logs, error logs)
• Analytics dashboards (exports, summaries)

How to limit exposure:

• Avoid recording audio unless required
• If recording is needed, separate storage and apply strict retention
• Redact sensitive fields in transcripts
• Use least-privilege API keys for tool calls
• Do not log raw payloads in production
• Prefer self-host or controlled hosting for core components

Top failure modes and safeguards (from real deployments)

Failure modes show up repeatedly across deployments. Plan for them before launch.

Top failure modes (seen in practice):

1. PII/PHI leakage
2. Weak healthcare terminology understanding
3. Losing patient context

Safeguards that work:

• Masking/redaction in transcripts and logs
• Self-hosting to reduce third-party hops
• A custom keyword dictionary for clinic terminology (drug names, doctor names)
• Healthcare-tuned models when possible
• RAG-based context retrieval with strict access controls

Data retention and residency (region-by-region rules)

Residency matters because healthcare rules differ widely by region and domain. Even within one country, contracts may require specific storage locations.

Practical approach:

• Store only what you need for operations and quality
• Set short retention for raw audio unless required
• Keep transcripts longer only if needed for audit and improvement
• Co-locate storage with your environment when possible

Self-hosting helps because you control where data lives. It also reduces exposure from multi-tenant environments.

Operational controls: audit logs, access reviews, testing before launch

Operational controls are how you prove compliance over time. Set them up before you connect real patients.

Minimum operational controls:

• Audit logs for workflow edits and prompt edits
• RBAC for who can access transcripts and recordings
• Monthly access reviews for staff and vendors
• Pre-launch test plan with edge cases
• Ongoing monitoring of escalation failures

Dograh's practical angle: iterate fast, but treat production like clinical infrastructure. No shortcuts.

Building Voice Bot for Africa: Scaling Affordable Voice AI without Breaking

Voice AI is booming, but building for Africa, especially Nigeria, requires handling diverse accents, languages, and real-world conditions. In this webinar, Muyiwa Ogundiya shares practical lessons on scaling affordable, high-quality voice agents that work in African markets.

Dograh AIMuyiwa Ogundiya

Testing, Monitoring, and Improving Call Quality (Before and After Launch)

Testing is how you avoid patient harm and bad experiences. You need both scripted tests and stress tests.

Test scripts for healthcare (edge cases + urgent intent)

Build a repeatable test suite. Run it every time you change prompts or workflows.

Healthcare test checklist:

• Misheard names (similar last names)
• DOB verification failures and retries
• Accents and multilingual callers
• Noisy environment calls
• Patient refuses recording consent
• Caller asks for medical diagnosis (agent must refuse safely)
• Emergency symptoms:
  

  1. chest pain, stroke signs, suicidal ideation, severe bleeding

• Pediatric scenarios (if applicable)
• Wrong department routing
• EHR/scheduler downtime (fallback behavior)

AI-to-AI testing with Looptalk (stress test with personas)

Dograh includes an early-stage AI-to-AI testing suite called Looptalk. It lets simulated callers stress test your agent with different personas.

A practical use:

• Persona: "angry patient"
• Persona: "elderly caller with hearing issues"
• Persona: "Spanish-speaking caller"
• Persona: "very short answers"
• Persona: "talks too much"
• Persona: "urgent symptom hints"

This helps you find failure points before real patients hit them. It also supports faster iteration while keeping safety rules stable.

Metrics to track (deflection, handle time, transfer rate, completion)

Pick metrics that show operational value and safety. Track them weekly and by call type.

Core KPIs:

• Containment/deflection rate (calls fully handled by AI)
• Average handle time (AHT)
• Transfer rate to humans (overall and by intent)
• Task completion rate (booked, confirmed, intake captured)
• Drop-off rate (hang-ups mid-flow)
• Urgent escalation detection rate (false positives and false negatives)
• Patient satisfaction signals (if you collect them)

How IIT Delhi Teamed up with Dograh for Alumni Day Invitations: A 1-week AI RSVP rollout

IIT Delhi partnered with Dograh to automate Alumni Day invitations across batches from 1966–2025. In one week, Dograh managed invites, captured RSVPs with family counts, answered FAQs, and gathered referrals. This guide shares the workflow, learnings, and recommendations for alumni associations.

Dograh AIDograh AI

What is AI-to-AI testing with Looptalk (persona-based stress testing)?

AI-to-AI testing means an AI caller talks to your AI agent to simulate real-world conversations at scale. Instead of manual QA, you run hundreds of scenarios quickly.

Looptalk's core idea is persona-based testing:

• You define caller profiles and goals
• You run scripted and semi-random conversations
• You measure where the agent fails: bad routing, missed consent, wrong escalation

In healthcare, this matters because rare edge cases are high risk. Stress testing helps you catch issues like urgent intent not triggering a warm transfer, or identity checks failing in noisy calls.

Build vs Buy (and a Practical Path for Most Teams)

Most healthcare teams should take a blended strategy. Start with what is safe and deployable, then expand.

When to buy: fastest time-to-value Buying makes sense when:

• You need a fast rollout with packaged support
• You need a fast rollout with packaged support
• Your workflow is standard (basic scheduling, reminders)
• You have limited engineering capacity
• You accept vendor hosting and compliance model after reviewv

Packaged solutions can help you show ROI quickly. For example, reported outcomes from voice AI and conversational AI include:

Apollo Hospitals: 46% higher provider productivity, saving 44 hours per provider monthly with voice AI for scheduling and reminders

Allure Medical (Voiceoc): 175+ staff hours saved/month and 25.4% confirmation increase using voice AI

Conversational AI ROI often shows up in under 12 months, and 54% of payers ranked it top for patient engagement

Use these as directional benchmarks, not guarantees.

When to build/self-host: compliance, residency, and cost control

Build/self-host is a strong choice when:

• PHI rules are strict and you want fewer third-party hops
• You need data residency control
• You want BYO STT/LLM/TTS choices
• You need custom integrations to internal systems
• You want long-term cost control and platform independence

This is why Dograh exists. I do not think healthcare teams should hand core patient-access infrastructure to a black box they cannot audit or move.

Suggested rollout plan (start small, then expand use cases)

A safe rollout sequence:

• Start with AI receptionist or pre-visit intake
• Add reminders and confirmations
• Add lab follow-ups and post-visit check-ins
• Add billing routing and payments (with careful scope)
• Add prior auth / benefits workflows if you have payer ops
• Expand multilingual support and persona testing

A real-world community example shows how fast follow-up can change conversion. See: how a voice agent automation improved clinic conversions. Treat it as a pattern: speed-to-lead + consistent follow-up + scheduling integration.

Retell AI vs Open-Source Voice Agent Platforms: Which to choose ?

Compare Retell AI with Open-Source voice platforms like Dograh, Pipecat, LiveKit, and Vocode on cost, control, and scalability.

Retell vs Open Source

Closing note

Healthcare voice agents work best when they are treated as operational systems with safety rules. Start with one workflow, measure outcomes, and expand carefully.

If you want to build and self-host a HIPAA-ready workflow with BYO STT/LLM/TTS and fast iteration, start here:

• Dograh AI for platform details
• Dograh AI cloud app to prototype quickly
• Healthcare AI Voice Agent repo example to study workflow patterns

Dograh is looking for beta users, contributors, and feedback. If you are building in healthcare, start with intake or receptionist, then run Looptalk stress testing before you go live.

FAQ's